My barber tells me that the revelation on the Surveillance
Programs of the National Security Agency (NSA) also generated some debates in
the barbershop. He wonders what my take is.
Should the government gather private information from
social and communications networks for security purposes? Should privacy
be sacrificed to secure us from terrorists and criminals?
The so-called leaks provided by Edward Snowden to The Guardian
and the Washington Post should not really surprise anybody especially in this
digital age. The fact that NSA would like to access data from
Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Verizon and the like in order to check any
abnormal, extra-ordinary, illegal, criminal or possibly terroristic activity is
expected. It is allowed for public safety or national security but
subject to due process provided by law.
Snowden, for his revelations, has been described as a
“whistleblower” by some media or news outlets. This is probably because
they were assuming that Snowden exposed some illegal activity of the
government. The documents that he leaked are supposed to be
classified and top secret.
A “whistleblower” refers to an employee reporting about alleged
dishonest or illegal activities occurring in a government agency, a public or
private organization, or a company.
Are the NSA surveillance programs dishonest or illegal?
They appear to be authorized because they were being implemented with
Congressional oversight and judicial approval. In short, the three
branches of the government are involved in accordance with the Patriot’s Act.
The ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) is suing so it
disagrees to a certain extent. But many do not consider Snowden a
whistleblower. In fact, former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John
Bolton said, “Edward Snowden is a "traitor" who has "committed an act
of war against the United States," in an exclusive interview with Newsmax.
“The self-confessed leaker of top-secret documents detailing the National Security Agency's phone- and Internet-surveillance programs is a ‘deceitful and dishonest man’ who violated oaths he undertook to keep secret classified information about a program approved by all three branches of the government to protect Americans”, Bolton added.
“The self-confessed leaker of top-secret documents detailing the National Security Agency's phone- and Internet-surveillance programs is a ‘deceitful and dishonest man’ who violated oaths he undertook to keep secret classified information about a program approved by all three branches of the government to protect Americans”, Bolton added.
Former CIA
Director James Woolsey
also commented on what Snowden did: “Well, he's done two things. He's
decided to ignore President Obama's I think very clear statement a couple days
ago that you can't have both 100-percent privacy and 100-percent security,
you've got to strike some kind of balance. Snowden decided no, you go for only
privacy and don't consider security.
“The
second thing he decided was that even though the president and the Congress and
the courts, working very hard on a new system that they've set up in order to
regulate these activities, that they are all three to be ignored and that he,
Snowden, should be the decision-maker for the American people and a lot of
other people as well as to where the line between security and privacy is
drawn. And I think it is an extraordinarily terrible thing for him to have
done.”
We, the
people are the Governed who entrusted representatives in the Government to
protect us, make laws, interpret the laws, and execute them for us.
For these tasks, we compensate them and give them our trust.
Of course, if they abuse the powers granted them, we have processes to
stop the abuse – even to punish the abusers.
An
employee of Booz Allen, a trusted government contractor, Snowden was given the
necessary security clearances to access confidential information with the
corresponding oath not to leak them. Booz Allen already fired him
for violating company policy and their trust. For legal violations, due
process will be followed which means extradition (he is currently in Hong
Kong), investigation, and court trial. He will get a fair trial.
Privacy
is very important to us. But we also know that absolute or complete
privacy is impossible to have in a civilized and now digital world. In
order to enjoy national safety and security, we are expected to give up some
privacy. To obtain a cure for or prevent illness, we have to provide
information to our doctor or the hospital. To get the best legal defense,
the defendant will have to provide his attorney all the information he needs.
Video cameras are installed in strategic places to monitor movements
in department stores and other locations.
While
we enjoy our freedom of speech, we expect listeners or readers not just to
absorb them but they may share them with others as well. If we join and
/or use Facebook, Linkedin, Instagram, Twitter, Bing, Yahoo, Google, and other
social media outlets, we voluntarily give information. These are
private entities that we trust to store data about our lives, what we say about
others, and ourselves and about issues. Verizon and other cable and
communications network have to monitor our use of their facilities to bill us
correctly.
Of
course, we already provide so much information to the government. We
trust it more because the public officials hold positions of Public Trust.
For benefits received, we provide them with tax, social security, credit,
and various types of required and/or voluntary information.
To be
able to use efficient and effective search capabilities, we use Google, Bing,
Yahoo and other engines. In exchange, we give back data about our searchable
selves. GPS helps us provide directions or find locations but we
have to provide information. As we seek to find, we also expect to be found.
Government, Google, GPS, Grownups, Girl (Groom)
Obtaining
the maximum benefits of Good Governance; utilizing effectively and efficiently
Google, GPS, GoodReader and the like; expecting wise advice and counsel from
Grownups such as Grandpas and Godfathers; and hoping to find the right Girl or
Groom, you have to give and take data and information. The amount
of love that you give to an entity is always commensurate to the amount of
information that you have on and take from that entity.
GOD, Golden Rule
Stretching
it further even to the religious, you know that, in this material world, there
is an Infinite Power monitoring your daily activities. In some cases you
feel targeted and challenged to face obstacles and crosses to carry. By
your actions, you will be judged.
To be
safe and secure, you follow the Golden Rule: Do Good and Avoid
Evil.
This should be true as we suspect and expect
some form of monitoring by the Government, Google, GPS and the like, and the
Grownups. Just “Do Good” by obeying the laws and “Avoid Evil” by not
violating them.
@ Benjamin Maynigo You should have added "Grandkids" (or "Grandchildren" with their child-like innocence -- as contra-distinguished from the childish attitude sometimes of some of our elected or appointed adult leaders. Because in real life, grandchildren often teach their grandparents how to operate computers, smart phones & even new electronic gadgets. Not too many senior citizens are as computer-savvy as you are, Benjamin Maynigo, or your barber. Best wishes & more power to your column, Bobby M. Reyes
ReplyDeleteYou are right Lolo Bobby. Grandkids and Geeks with their Gadgets and currently described as Digital Natives certainly play a more effective Grownup game in the acquisition and dissemination of data and information. - Ben
Delete