“All Politics is local”, said former
U.S. House Speaker Tip O’Neill.
Let me add “regional” the way it is
currently played.
As a very interested observant and
student of politics in the United
States and the Philippines I was
lucky to have actively participated
in presidential and local elections
in both countries.
In the United States, the
presidential winner seems to be determined
by the results of certain “Swing or
Battleground” States like Florida,
Ohio, Virginia, Colorado,
Pennsylvania, and a couple of others.
In the U.S. 2012 presidential
elections, I correctly predicted the
results with the help of well known
statistician Nate Silver’s formula. In
the Philippine presidential elections
where my own Law classmate Rod
Duterte was a candidate, I also
correctly predicted the victory of
both Duterte as President, and Leni
Robredo as Vice President.
Noticeable in the 2016 Philippine
presidential elections are the
sources of the votes. Mindanao gave
Duterte landslide votes. His
closest opponent Roxas, not
surprisingly, was the winner in most of the
major Visayan provinces.
The battle for the Vice Presidency
between Ferdinand Marcos, Jr.
(Bongbong) and Leni Robredo is more interesting
to note. While Leni
Robredo won, the results were close.
Bongbong obtained about 80% or
more of the votes in the Ilocos
Region. The latter is known in local
politics as Solid North. In fact, the
region produced several Ilocano
presidents since the Philippines
became a Republic: Elpidio Quirino,
Ramon Magsaysay, Marcos, Sr., and
Fidel Ramos. Although Carlos P.
Garcia is known to have hailed from
Bohol, he is considered a
Full-Blooded Ilocano (FBI) because
both of his parents are from Abra.
The Ilocano votes of Bongbong Marcos
were matched by the Bicolano
votes plus more that Leni Robredo
obtained from the Bicol provinces. She
also obtained about 80% or more of
the votes in the area. VP
candidates Senators Escudero and
Honasan also hail from the
region.There has never been a winning
presidential or vice
presidential candidate from Bicol.
While all politics is local and
therefore territorial, it is also
ideological in the United States. One
must either be a conservative or a
progressive.
This is not so in the Philippines.
Major parties are not distinguished
along ideological lines.
I am an Ilocano. That is why a friend
was surprised when he found out
during Martial Law that I was an avid
critic of Marcos. I explained to
him that being an Ilocano does not
necessarily mean pro-any Ilocano
or pro-Marcos. I went on to explain
how the battle was drawn using the
political spectrum analysis during
Martial Law.
On the extreme left, I said, was Jose
Ma. Sison, an Ilocano UP
professor who founded the Kabataang
Makabayan (KM), led the Communist
Party of the Philippines and the New
People’s Army.
The Christian Left was led by Ilocano rebel priest Fr. Conrad
Balweg ,
a Catholic priest who began his revolutionary career defending
the
ancestral land rights of the Tinggians, of Abra Province in the
Cordillera Mountains of Northern Luzon, against government-backed
mining operations. Abandoned by the Church and hunted by the
government, he went underground and joined the Communist Party
of the
Philippines/New People's Army. He is the Philippines’ Fr. Camilo
Torres who espoused the Theology of Liberation and a comrade of
Latin
America’s Che Guevara.
Left of Center were Raul S. Manglapus and Sonny Alvarez of the
Movement for a Free Philippines (MFP), President and Secretary
General, respectively. The former was an Ex-Senator and Foreign
Affairs Secretary who hailed from Tagudin, Ilocos Sur while the
latter
was a Delegate to the Constitutional Convention who came from
Santiago, Isabela.
Of course, on the extreme right was
dictator/fascist Ferdinand Marcos
and his Ilocano generals led by his
Chief of Staff Ilocano Fabian Ver.
Based on this analysis, I have shown
that not all Ilocanos were so bad
that they blindly and solidly
supported a dictator who actually robbed
them blind – of their civil rights and their bright
future.
No comments:
Post a Comment